The role of routine second-look endoscopy in the management of patients with acute peptic ulcer bleeding is controversial. A more precise identification of higher risk patient group, based on both clinical and endoscopic criteria, is needed to determine whether there are high-risk patients who may benefit from this management strategy. Aim: Or aim was to find out whether scheduled second-look endoscopy has any beneficial effect in the clinical outcome. Methods: Both endoscopic and clinical data were analyzed in 274 acute gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding patients. The need for repeated endoscopic haemostatic intervention was used as a measure to evaluate the potential beneficial effect of the second look endoscopy. Patients were categorized according to the Forrest classification detected during the emergency endoscopy. Results: In the subgroup of actively bleeding patients (Forrest Ia, Ib) a second endoscopic haemostasis was performed in 23.8% of cases. In the patient subgroup with visible vessel ulcers (Forrest IIa) and in those with adherent clot covered ulcers (Forrest IIb) the needs for a repeated haemostasis were 13.0% and 13.3% respectively. Despite the not statistically significant differences, remarkable clinical impact was noted favoring scheduled second look endoscopy in patients with initially active ulcer bleeding. Conclusion: In the light of the retrospective study results it may be concluded that the scheduled second look endoscopy strategy offers a beneficial clinical outcome for selected patients estimated to be a very high risk of re-bleeding following the initial endoscopic therapy for active bleeding.