Despite the greater attention and investment in pedestrian safety measures typically allocated to urban areas, rural villages are frequently overlooked in this respect. A school zone typically applied in urban contexts, refers to a road network surrounding a school where younger pedestrians are likely to be present. The research objective was to gain insight into the traffic preferences of key stakeholders, including teachers, pupils, parents, and representatives of the road authority, regarding the safety of pedestrian crossings in the vicinity of small village schools. A survey was conducted at selected primary schools with relatively high traffic volumes and a high risk of pedestrian accidents. The survey evaluated six different types of designated pedestrian crossings equipped with different traffic engineering devices. The results of the Spearman rank correlation analysis indicate a high degree of alignment between the perspectives of parents and school pupils. At the same time, those of road professionals diverge significantly from those of parents. The teachers’ perspectives exhibit moderate alignment with those of school pupils and road professionals, positioning them in a middle ground between these two groups. The findings demonstrate that the traffic engineering measures deemed safe by road users do not always correspond with those preferred by road professionals. A discrepancy between perceived and actual safety is frequently observed. To address this discrepancy, it is crucial to educate pedestrians about the advantages of safety devices that engineers have identified as effective. Concurrently, it would be prudent for those responsible for the management of roadways to give due consideration to the preferences of pedestrians during their planning activities.