Work addiction negatively impacts health and well-being, yet little research has focused on managers, whose excessive work involvement can affect entire organizations. This study examined psychological predictors of work addiction and differences between work-addicted and non-addicted managers. Two hundred managers were assessed via the Qualtrics research platform, with work addiction classified using the Bergen Work Addiction Scale. We analyzed 11 psychological measures: exhaustion, disengagement, stress, obsessive and harmonious passion, well-being, work-family and family-work conflict, perceived physical and mental health, and sleep quality. Logistic regression significantly predicted group membership (p < 0.001), explaining 39.7%–57.0% of the variance and correctly classifying 84.5% of cases. Multivariate analysis of variance showed significant differences across all measures except one between the two groups. Work-addicted managers also showed poorer physical and mental health, and lower sleep quality. The prevalence of work addiction was high (29%) in this sample, highlighting the need for targeted interventions. As the first study to identify multiple psychological predictors of work addiction in managers, the findings may be valuable for organizations concerned with occupational mental health. However, cross-national replication is necessary before generalizing results. Recognizing the psychological toll of work addiction can help policymakers develop effective, sustainable interventions.
Introduction – This study introduces Organizational Physical Activity Climate (OPAC) as a domain-specific extension of organizational climate theory, addressing the limited understanding of how workplace environments influence employees’ physical activity (PA), job satisfaction (JS), and job performance (JP). While prior research has primarily focused on individual-level determinants, organizational-level influences and their indirect effects on PA, JS, and JP remain insufficiently explored. Methods – Data were collected from 543 respondents through field visits to 60 universities and academic conferences in Istanbul. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted using JAMOVI-R, and structural equation modeling was performed using SmartPLS. Results – OPAC did not have a significant direct effect on job performance. However, PA partially mediated the OPAC-job performance relationship, while JS fully mediated this relationship. The serial mediation pathway from OPAC to PA, JS, and JP was also supported, although the effect was modest. Discussion – The study contributes to the literature by introducing and validating OPAC as a domain-specific organizational climate construct and by suggesting that its association with JP is primarily reflected through indirect behavioral and psychological pathways. It also offers practical implications for organizations aiming to enhance employee well-being and performance through health-supportive workplace climates.
Publication Name: Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Publication Date: 2026-01-01
Volume: 8
Issue: Unknown
Page Range: Unknown
Description:
Introduction – Athlete burnout is a growing concern in sports psychology. However, the joint associations of stress, harmonious passion, and obsessive passion with burnout outcomes, particularly across burnout dimensions, have received limited attention. Methods – This cross–sectional study examined how stress, harmonious passion, and obsessive passion predict overall burnout and its three main components using survey data from 345 regular exercisers. Results – Multiple regression analyses revealed that stress, obsessive passion, and harmonious passion significantly predicted 'exhaustion' (R² = .21): stress and obsessive passion were significant positive predictors (β = .16, p = .001; β = .34, p < .001), while harmonious passion was a strong negative predictor (β = –.43, p < .001). For “reduced sense of accomplishment”, stress and harmonious passion were significant predictors (β = .24, p < .001; β = −.34, p < .001; R² = .16), whereas obsessive passion showed no unique effect. Regarding “sport devaluation”, all three predictors were significant (R² = .24): stress and obsessive passion were positively related (β = .17, p < .001; β = .22, p < .001), while harmonious passion was negatively associated with devaluation (β = −.50, p < .001). Discussion – These findings suggest that pressure and passion orientations can significantly influence regular exercisers' susceptibility to burnout. Reducing stress and fostering harmonious passion may help protect regular exercisers from burnout.