The energy efficiency and hover stability of unmanned aerial vehicles are critical factors, since improper battery utilization and unstable control are major sources of operational failures and accidents. The proportional–integral–derivative (PID) controller, which is applied in approximately 97% of multirotor unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) systems, is widely used due to its simplicity; however, it is sensitive to external disturbances and often fails to ensure optimal energy utilization, resulting in reduced flight time. Therefore, the experimental investigation of advanced control methods in a real physical environment is well justified. The objective of the present research is the comparative evaluation of seven control strategies—PID, linear quadratic controller with integral action (LQI), model predictive control (MPC), sliding mode control (SMC), backstepping control, fractional-order PID (FOPID), and H∞ control—using a single-degree-of-freedom drone test platform in a MATLAB R2023b-Arduino hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) environment. Although the theoretical advantages and model-based results of the aforementioned control methods are well documented, the number of real-time comparative HIL experiments conducted under identical physical conditions remains limited. Consequently, only a small amount of unified and directly comparable experimental data is available regarding the performance of different controllers. The measurements were performed at a reference height of 120 mm under disturbance-free conditions and under wind loading with a velocity of 10 km/h applied at an angle of 45°. The controller performance was evaluated based on hover accuracy, settling time, overshoot, and real-time measured power consumption. The results indicate that modern control strategies provide significantly improved energy efficiency and faster stabilization compared to the PID controller in both disturbance-free and wind-loaded test scenarios. The investigations confirm that several advanced controllers can be applied more effectively than the PID controller to enhance hover stability and reduce energy consumption.