Background: Stroke incidence rises with age. A stroke can severely affect walking ability, requiring therapy. Robot-assisted walking therapy (ROB) has been advocated as one form of walking rehabilitation in stroke patients. However, its comparative efficacy remains controversial and three-group comparisons are scant. We compared the effects of ROB, walking training therapy without a robot (WTT) and standard treatment therapy (STT) on clinical and mobility outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients. Methods: Individuals (n = 45, 71 % males, age 64.4y ±6.34), who have recently experienced an ischemic stroke, were randomized to ROB, WTT or STT. Clinical and mobility outcomes were assessed before and after each intervention (3 weeks, 5 sessions/week) and after 5 weeks of no-intervention follow-up. Results: Outcomes did not differ between groups at baseline (p > 0.05). Modified Rankin Scale (primary outcome), improved (p < 0.05) after ROB and WTT vs. STT. These improvements were retained relative to baseline (p < 0.05) after follow-up. Barthel index, Berg Balance Scale, 10-m walking speed, the distance while walking with and without the robot for six minutes, and center pressure velocity in standing improved most after ROB (all p < 0.001), exceeding the changes after WTT which in turn were greater than the changes after STT (p ≤ 0.040). Conclusion: Older adults shortly after an ischemic stroke can quickly learn to walk with a soft robot and retain substantial clinical and mobility improvements at follow-up.

Background: Beam walking is a new test to estimate dynamic balance. We characterized dynamic balance measured by the distance walked on beams of different widths in five age groups of healthy adults (20, 30, 40, 50, 60 years) and individuals with neurological conditions (i.e., Parkinson, multiple sclerosis, stroke, age: 66.9 years) and determined if beam walking distance predicted prospective falls over 12 months. Methods: Individuals with (n = 97) and without neurological conditions (n = 99, healthy adults, age 20–60) participated in this prospective longitudinal study. Falls analyses over 12 months were conducted. The summed distance walked under single (walking only) and dual-task conditions (walking and serial subtraction by 7 between 300 to 900) on three beams (4, 8, and 12-cm wide) was used in the analyses. Additional functional tests comprised grip strength and the Short Physical Performance Battery. Results: Beam walking distance was unaffected on the 12-cm-wide beam in the healthy adult groups. The distance walked on the 8-cm-wide beam decreased by 0.34 m in the 20-year-old group. This reduction was ~ 3 × greater, 1.1 m, in the 60-year-old group. In patients, beam walking distances decreased sharply by 0.8 m on the 8 versus 12 cm beam and by additional 1.6 m on the 4 versus 8 cm beam. Beam walking distance under single and dual-task conditions was linearly but weakly associated with age (R² = 0.21 for single task, R² = 0.27 for dual-task). Age, disease, and beam width affected distance walked on the beam. Beam walking distance predicted future falls in the combined population of healthy adults and patients with neurological conditions. Based on receiver operating characteristic curve analyses using data from the entire study population, walking ~ 8.0 of the 12 m maximum on low-lying beams predicted future fallers with reasonable accuracy. Conclusion: Balance beam walking is a new but worthwhile measure of dynamic balance to predict falls in the combined population of healthy adults and patients with neurological conditions. Future studies are needed to evaluate the predictive capability of beam walking separately in more homogenous populations. Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT03532984.

The objective of this paper is to determine and compare the effects of two high-intensity virtual training programs, with different frequencies and standard care after stroke. First-time ischaemic stroke patients in subacute stage were randomized into three groups: 1 session/day high-intensity virtual training (VT1; n=20), 2 sessions/day high-intensity virtual training (VT2, n=20), standard care (CON, n=20). Each group performed a 5-week-long training program (1 hour/session, 5 days/week). Results were measured before and after the interventions. Our primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), which indicates the degree of independence in daily activities and the severity of disability at stroke survivors. Secondary outcomes were the Barthel Index (BI), the EuroQoL Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), the 6-minute walking test (6mWT), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and posturograpic examination in four different positions (WEO, WEC, NEO, NEC). VT2 and VT1 groups improved significantly all of the results (all p<0,05). The result of the mRS, BI, BBS, 6mWT, BDI improved significantly (all p <0.05) in CON group, but there was no clinically meaningful changes in EQ VAS, WEO, WEC, NEO, and NEC (all p>0.05).Comparing the groups’ measured 10 results: VT2 in 9 cases (mRS, BI, EQ VAS, BBS, 6mWT, BDI, WEC, NEO, NEC), VT1 in 5 cases (mRS, 6mWT, BDI, WEC, NEC) showed greater extent improvement than CON group, furthermore the improvements of mRS and BI were significantly higher at VT2, than at VT1 (all p<0.05). Our results show that the high-intensity virtual training programs could be good opportunities for subacute ischaemic stroke patients to improve their clinical symptoms, mobility, and quality of life. Furthermore, increasing daily frequency of the training, could also increase the beneficial effects. This research is particularly important because the utilized therapies have the potential to yield significant economic benefits, by reducing long-term healthcare costs and improving overall patient outcomes.

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of advanced robotic therapy, virtual therapy and conventional physiotherapy in the rehabilitation of patients with acute and subacute stroke. In addition, we aim to further demonstrate the importance of an early mobilisation exercise program in the management of acute stroke patients. Participants (first-time ischaemic stroke patients in acute or subacute stages) were randomly divided into three equal groups (n=10 persons/group): a robot-assisted early mobilisation + virtual reality therapy (ROB+VR) group, a robot-assisted early mobilisation + conventional physiotherapy (ROB+FIZ) group, and a conventional physiotherapy (CON) group. Each group performed a 3-week-long training program (1 hour/session, 5 days/week). The results were measured before and after the exercise. The primary outcome measure used was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) which indicates the severity of disability in daily activities and measures the degree of independence of the individual. The secondary outcomes were measured by the EuroQoL 5 dimensions questionnaire 5 levels version (EQ-5D-5L), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), the Barthel Index (BI), and the 6-minute walking test (6mWT). All the three groups showed improvements in most outcomes. The scores for BI, EQ-5D-5L, and mRS showed significant improvements in quality of life. Comparing the groups, the ROB+VR group showed the greatest improvement in the scores in almost all of the tests. From the test scores, the 6-minute walk test had the highest improvement at the end of the therapy (94.58% improvement). Our results show that early robotic mobilization, followed by a movement program, combined with a virtual reality therapy, significantly improve both the speed and quality of rehabilitation after a stroke.