To effectively support new rural CBTs and create development plans, it is necessary to have a broad understanding of rural CBT in developing countries. This study uses Indonesia as a case study to map and analyze patterns in earlier research in order to establish a conceptual framework. The study used a qualitative content analysis methodology to find important themes and trends in Indonesia's rural CBT development by examining journal papers indexed by Scopus that were referenced by other researchers. By charting these academic works, the researchers were able to get a wider view and identify potential problems in the sector. The analysis identified five interconnected dimensions - spatial aspects, local attractions, rural capacity, economic viability, and socio-cultural components - that form the foundation of rural CBT. These dimensions are critical in building a comprehensive framework that guides development planning, stakeholder collaboration, and long-term sustainability. Findings emphasize the importance of aligning rural CBT development with the principles of the circular economy, which promote environmental stewardship, community empowerment, and sustainable resource management. The study also highlights how preserving social capital, fostering inclusiveness, and enhancing local welfare are long-term goals achievable through strategic mapping, capacity building, and equitable profit distribution. The study also emphasizes how important social media and digital platforms are in influencing public perceptions and interest in rural tourism, which has aided in the quick ascent of rural CBT organizations throughout Indonesia. It becomes clear that community involvement and government assistance are essential to turning rural regions into sustainable travel destinations. Nonetheless, it is necessary to address enduring issues including environmental degradation, human resource problems, and infrastructure constraints. Ultimately, the study offers a rural CBT framework that can assist policymakers, tourism planners, and local stakeholders in making context-sensitive decisions. By integrating socio-spatial understanding, participatory planning, and capacity-focused strategies, stakeholders can create more resilient, inclusive, and sustainable tourism systems. This framework not only supports local livelihoods but also aligns with global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), offering a replicable model for other developing countries seeking to implement rural CBT initiatives effectively.

The global goal of development concerns has embraced global action, leading to framework initiatives grounded in future-proof projects. Closely aligned with circular economy (CE) initiatives, which minimize single-use materials and address practices that reflect sustainability concepts, studies are rapidly emerging to identify practices in CE literatures relevant to SDGs. Therefore, a study to identify the CE literatures' contribution towards domains and targets in SDGs is highly urgent. By drawing a total of 4431 as a sampling of final literature analyzed using instrument tools in metrics mapping. Our discovery shows that CE studies contribute to posts in SDGS target achievement, which keeps on increasing. To dive deep into CE research on CE’s relevance to SDGs, it was observed that China’s scholars offered their publications in various viewpoints. Significantly, SDG12 (n = 68.9%) and have exceeded half a percentage of publications covering CE relevance to SDGs, implied that CE studies focused heavily on sustainable consumption and production patterns through actions in reaching SDGs. Followed by SDG7 (n = 6.3%), strongly reinforcing CE provides assessed value in SDGs calling for affordable and sustainable development and energy for all, in line with relied CE actions in considering innovation models to recreate product and energy resource reuse practices in a bid to minimize the adverse impacts for future. Given additional insights on circular economy targets related to SDGs, the research implication was to provide a policy recommendation to encourage the practice of circular economy based on SDGs targets.

Southeast Asia faced an urgent waste crisis, particularly in Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and the Philip-pines, threatening severe environmental, ecosystem, and public health consequences. Without a comprehensive waste management policy, conditions deteriorated significantly. This research explored waste management policy studies with a bibliometric lens in four Southeast Asian countries: Indonesia, Thailand, Malay-sia, and the Philippines. Using the Scopus database, powered by the VOSViewer software and the biblio-metrix-R studio package, this research provided a precise visualization. The findings revealed that four countries exhibited an upward yet fluctuating trend in publication output, with Indonesia emerging as the leading contributor in recent years. Furthermore, most documents studied by scholars, the highest impact documents, and most documents in journal sources were also discussed. Two affiliates in Malaysia were the leading affiliates, followed by two affiliates from Thailand. Moreover, environmental science and social science were areas of interest for scholars. Term network trajectory mapping and thematic maps were comprehen-sively included. In sum, Indonesia fought hard against plastic waste to minimize climate change, while Malaysia focused on addressing waste emissions and household waste. The Philippines sought to raise awareness about the microplastic problem in the ocean and promote public awareness of waste management. Thailand requires attention to financing waste management equipment, implementing environmentally friendly solutions, and revising waste management rules. Its implications underlined a new complex of waste issues in Southeast Asia, requiring adapted strategies and solutions to address each country’s waste challenges and concerns. Current research contributed to the existing state-of-knowledge by providing disaggregated views of national waste management policy in those countries. It also highlighted key potential future hotspots for targeted interventions and resource allocation; thus, future policies and collaborations in waste management might have become more effective and impactful.