Theoretical background: There are several measuring instruments in the international literature for measuring spirituality. One of the most widely used and reliable self-reported questionnaires is the Spiritual Health and Life-Orientation Measure (SHALOM). The questionnaire captures spiritual well-being holistically and is therefore well-suited to both religious and non-religious individuals. Aims: The primary objective of our study is to adapt SHALOM to Hungarian and to perform detailed psychometric analysis, including testing factor structure, reliability, and validity. Methods: The questionnaire package used for validation (SHALOM, WBI-5 / WHO Well-Being Questionnaire /, SWLS / Life Satisfaction Scale /) was completed by a total of 437 university students (male: 24.2%, female: 75.8%, mean age = 21.6 years; SD = 1.8 years). Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyzes on the items of the SHALOM questionnaire confirmed the bifactor structure (4 primary and 1 general factors), supporting the theoretical factor structure of the instrument. The primary factors are: Personal, Social, Environmental, and Transcendent Scales for both aspectsof evaluation (ideal and experienced). However, there were 6 items that did not fit perfectly into the four primary factors: 4 items for ideal assessment and 2 items for experienced. In the ideal assessment, the items in the questionnaire explain 66.6% of the total variance and 64.9% in the case of experienced. Factor structures gave acceptable fit indicators for both evaluation aspects (CFIideal = 0.99 and CFIexperienced = 0.97; and RMSEAideal = 0.057 and RMSEAexperienced = 0.068). The Cronbach-α value ranges from 0.69 to 0.97, indicating an overall acceptable internal consistency and the stability in time of the questionnaire is also adequate. According to our validity study, the scales for the two evaluations of SHALOM are significantly positively correlated with the WHO Well- Being Index and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (with the exception of the Personal scale for ideal evaluation), with correlations ranging from weak to moderate. Conclusions: Our results support the bifactor structure of the SHALOM questionnaire, confirm the internal consistency of the scales, and support the validity of the Hungarian version of the measurement tool. However, further studies in the field of construct validity testing are warranted in the future.